Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low

Eleventh Circuit

Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low

697 F. App'x 616

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 28, 2017·No. No. 15-13996 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leland H. Kynes, appointed counsel on appeal for Llewellen F. Smith in this appeal from the dismissal of Smith’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the dismissal of Smith’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leland H. Kynes, appointed counsel on appeal for Llewellen F. Smith in this appeal from the dismissal of Smith’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the dismissal of Smith’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.

Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low, 697 F. App'x 616 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

697 F. App'x 616 (Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related