Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low

697 F. App'x 616
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 2017
DocketNo. 15-13996 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished

This text of 697 F. App'x 616 (Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Warden, FCC Coleman—Low, 697 F. App'x 616 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leland H. Kynes, appointed counsel on appeal for Llewellen F. Smith in this appeal from the dismissal of Smith’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the dismissal of Smith’s § 2241 petition is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 F. App'x 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-warden-fcc-colemanlow-ca11-2017.