Smith v. Wang

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. Wang. Read the opinion of the Court — 370 F. App'x 377
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. 11-6052·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6052

JOHNATHAN LEE SMITH, a/k/a Johnathan L. X. Smith, a/k/a Johnathan Lee X Smith,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LAWRENCE WANG, M.D.; A. GILES, Nurse; P. MCHALKO, Nurse; D. GILES, Nurse; C. WATSON, Unit Manager; M. SMITH, Sergeant of Security; J. LUTHER, Officer; K. UNDERWOOD, Officer; J. MORRISON, Officer; P. PAGET, Officer; J. BRUMFIELD, Officer; S. FARMER, Rehabilitation Counselor; V. BRYON, Rehabilitation Counselor; JEFFREY DILLMAN, Warden; JOHN GARMAN, Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00370-sgw-mfu)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Johnathan Lee Smith, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Johnathan Lee Smith appeals the district court’s

orders dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint

and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. Wang, No.

7:09-cv-00370-sgw-mfu (W.D. Va. Sept. 7, 2010; Dec. 7, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Wang, (4th Cir. 2011).

Smith v. Wang (Smith v. Wang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.