Smith v. Wallace

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Smith v. Wallace

87 A. 165, 110 Me. 548, 1913 Me. LEXIS 51

DecidedJune 28, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 87 A. 165 (Smith v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Wallace, 87 A. 165, 110 Me. 548, 1913 Me. LEXIS 51 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

This -is. an action of trespass for entering upon plaintiff’s land ‘in Jonesport and picking and carrying away blueberries. Defendants admitted entry and [549]*549justified under Osear W. Look and John V. Sawyer. Plaintiff claimed 'title by prescription. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant filed exceptions and motion for new trial. Motion and exceptions overruled.

A. D. McFaul and J. F. Lynch, for plaintiff. H. H. Gray and O. H. Dunbar, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This -is. an action of trespass for entering upon plaintiff’s land ‘in Jonesport and picking and carrying away blueberries. Defendants admitted entry and [549]*549justified under Osear W. Look and John V. Sawyer. Plaintiff claimed 'title by prescription. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiff. Defendant filed exceptions and motion for new trial. Motion and exceptions overruled.

A. D. McFaul and J. F. Lynch, for plaintiff. H. H. Gray and O. H. Dunbar, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A. 165, 110 Me. 548, 1913 Me. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wallace-me-1913.