Smith v. Walker & Izlar

46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 615, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 302
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 3, 1904·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Tdbnek, J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Sanner v. Shivers, 76 Ga. 335, wherein it was held that the “ monthly wages of a locomotive engineer in the employment of a railroad corporation are not subject to the process of garnishment in this State.” As a finding in favor of the prevailing party below was demanded by the evidence, the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict of the jury.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Walker & Izlar, 46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 615, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 302 (Ga. 1904).

46 S.E. 831 (Smith v. Walker & Izlar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dantley v. Burge
77 S.E.2d 107 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
King v. Yarbray
71 S.E. 131 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Lears v. Seaboard Air-Line Railway
60 S.E. 343 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1908)
Johnson v. Hicks
48 S.E. 383 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)