Smith v. Walker & Izlar

Supreme Court of Georgia

Smith v. Walker & Izlar

46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 615, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 302

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 3, 1904

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 46 S.E. 831 (Smith v. Walker & Izlar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Walker & Izlar, 46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 615, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 302 (Ga. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Tdbnek, J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Sanner v. Shivers, 76 Ga. 335, wherein it was held that the “ monthly wages of a locomotive engineer in the employment of a railroad corporation are not subject to the process of garnishment in this State.” As a finding in favor of the prevailing party below was demanded by the evidence, the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict of the jury.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tdbnek, J.

This case is controlled by the decision of this court in Sanner v. Shivers, 76 Ga. 335, wherein it was held that the “ monthly wages of a locomotive engineer in the employment of a railroad corporation are not subject to the process of garnishment in this State.” As a finding in favor of the prevailing party below was demanded by the evidence, the trial court erred in setting aside the verdict of the jury.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Simmons, C. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 S.E. 831, 119 Ga. 615, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-walker-izlar-ga-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack