Smith v. Walkeen Millinery Co.

76 S.E. 992, 12 Ga. App. 119, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 455
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 22, 1913·No. 4310·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

Even if an entirely different conclusion should have been reached, and even though the judgment upon the certiorari would have been different but for intermediate error, yet where there is a judgment on the merits of the certiorari, it, matters no more that it was compelled by, and is in fact wholly dependent upon, an intermediate error antecedent to the judgment than that the judgment is error.’ The only remedy in either event must be sought by writ of error; and a renewal of the suit by a second certiorari is not available.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Walkeen Millinery Co., 76 S.E. 992, 12 Ga. App. 119, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 455 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

76 S.E. 992 (Smith v. Walkeen Millinery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dillingham v. Eslinger
122 S.E. 627 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)