Smith v. Waldron

Supreme Court of Florida

Smith v. Waldron

107 So. 365, 91 Fla. 38

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 14, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 107 So. 365 (Smith v. Waldron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Waldron, 107 So. 365, 91 Fla. 38 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— As the bill herein praying for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell “5 acres of land at ..................Pompano less one lot” shows that the alleged written contract describes no land, was not signed by the owner of the land, or by anyone for her, and that the complainant was not put into possession, the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been sustained.

*39 Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

— As the bill herein praying for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell “5 acres of land at ..................Pompano less one lot” shows that the alleged written contract describes no land, was not signed by the owner of the land, or by anyone for her, and that the complainant was not put into possession, the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been sustained.

*39 Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 So. 365, 91 Fla. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-waldron-fla-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack