Smith v. Waldron

107 So. 365, 91 Fla. 38
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 14, 1926·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— As the bill herein praying for specific performance of an alleged contract to sell “5 acres of land at ..................Pompano less one lot” shows that the alleged written contract describes no land, was not signed by the owner of the land, or by anyone for her, and that the complainant was not put into possession, the demurrer to the bill of complaint should have been sustained.

*39 Reversed.

Brown, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Waldron, 107 So. 365, 91 Fla. 38 (Fla. 1926).

107 So. 365 (Smith v. Waldron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammond v. Hacker
111 So. 511 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)