Smith v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Smith v. Wal-Mart, Inc.

835 So. 2d 353, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 2003 WL 151220

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 23, 2003

DocketNo. 1D01-2077

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 835 So. 2d 353 (Smith v. Wal-Mart, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 835 So. 2d 353, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 2003 WL 151220 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order of dismissal is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for an explicit determination whether the plaintiffs failure to attend the mediation conference was willful. See Commonwealth Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990); Tiller v. Straub Capital Corp., 800 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Swindle v. Reid 242 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

BARFIELD, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s order of dismissal is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the trial court for an explicit determination whether the plaintiffs failure to attend the mediation conference was willful. See Commonwealth Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla.1990); Tiller v. Straub Capital Corp., 800 So.2d 364 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Swindle v. Reid 242 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971).

BARFIELD, POLSTON and HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

835 So. 2d 353, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 484, 2003 WL 151220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-wal-mart-inc-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack