Smith v. Vitek
This text of 256 N.W.2d 866 (Smith v. Vitek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Plaintiff, Larry E. Smith, appeals from the District Court’s denial of his request for a writ of mandamus to compel the State to discharge him from custody under the provisions of Laws 1975, L. B. 567. The sole issue presented is whether the provisions of L. B. 567 have retroactive application. We held in Johnson and Cunningham v. Exon, ante p. 154, 256 N. W. 2d 869 (1977), that they do if approved by the Board of Pardons. That case decides this issue and is controlling herein.
We reverse the judgment herein and remand the [163]*163cause to the District Court for reconsideration in light of our holding in Johnson and Cunningham v. Exon, ante p. 154, 256 N. W. 2d 869 (1977).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 N.W.2d 866, 199 Neb. 162, 1977 Neb. LEXIS 764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-vitek-neb-1977.