Smith v. Victory Container Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Smith v. Victory Container Corp.

26 A.D.2d 988, 275 N.Y.S.2d 46

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1966

DocketActions Nos. 1 & 2

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 A.D.2d 988 (Smith v. Victory Container Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Victory Container Corp., 26 A.D.2d 988, 275 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Under all the circumstances, plaintiff should have been permitted to amend the complaint in the negligence action so as to allege the two asserted violations of section 200 of the Labor Law as additional specifications of negligence; and proof of either violation would have then constituted evidence of negligence. (See Gelder v. International Ore Treating Co., 150 App. Div. 184, 187; Conte v. Large Scale Development Corp., 10 N Y 2d 20, 29.) Order affirmed, without costs. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. Under all the circumstances, plaintiff should have been permitted to amend the complaint in the negligence action so as to allege the two asserted violations of section 200 of the Labor Law as additional specifications of negligence; and proof of either violation would have then constituted evidence of negligence. (See Gelder v. International Ore Treating Co., 150 App. Div. 184, 187; Conte v. Large Scale Development Corp., 10 N Y 2d 20, 29.) Order affirmed, without costs. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 A.D.2d 988, 275 N.Y.S.2d 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-victory-container-corp-nyappdiv-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack