Smith v. Victory Container Corp.

26 A.D.2d 988, 275 N.Y.S.2d 46
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 29, 1966·No. Actions Nos. 1 & 2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Under all the circumstances, plaintiff should have been permitted to amend the complaint in the negligence action so as to allege the two asserted violations of section 200 of the Labor Law as additional specifications of negligence; and proof of either violation would have then constituted evidence of negligence. (See Gelder v. International Ore Treating Co., 150 App. Div. 184, 187; Conte v. Large Scale Development Corp., 10 N Y 2d 20, 29.) Order affirmed, without costs. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and in the interests of justice, and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Aulisi, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Victory Container Corp., 26 A.D.2d 988, 275 N.Y.S.2d 46 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

26 A.D.2d 988 (Smith v. Victory Container Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kalofonos v. State
115 Misc. 2d 692 (New York State Court of Claims, 1982)