Smith v. Vermont Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Smith)

79 B.R. 650, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1823
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland
DecidedNovember 18, 1987
Docket19-12483
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 79 B.R. 650 (Smith v. Vermont Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Smith)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Vermont Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n (In Re Smith), 79 B.R. 650, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1823 (Md. 1987).

Opinion

OPINION DISMISSING COMPLAINT

JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Bankruptcy Judge.

The instant adversary complaint came on for hearing before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland at Baltimore on October 27, 1987. The parties stipulated to all of the material facts. The plaintiff, a Chapter 7 debtor, filed the instant complaint to avoid or reduce the second mortgage held by the defendant and secured by the debtor’s principal residence identified as 3521 Oakmont Avenue in Baltimore City.

This Court will dismiss the instant case, adopting the reasoning of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of New York (Hayes, B.J.) in the leading case of In re Mahaner, 34 B.R. 308 (1983). Accord, In re Maitland, 61 B.R. 130 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1986). These cases stand for the proposition that a Chapter 7 debtor may not use 11 U.S.C. § 506 for the avoidance of a mortgage lien because (1) this would render meaningless redemption under 11 U.S.C. § 722; (2) it is bad policy to permit a Chapter 7 debtor to achieve a result more beneficial than could be realized in a Chapter 11 or 13, thereby discouraging debtors from turning to rehabilitation in favor of liquidation; and (3) a consensual lien created by the granting of a mortgage ought not be susceptible to avoidance by the mortgagor. For all these reasons, this Court holds that the Chapter 7 debtor in this case may not use 11 U.S.C. § 506 to avoid the mortgage lien of Vermont Federal Savings and Loan Association.

ORDER ACCORDINGLY.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Sills
126 B.R. 974 (S.D. Ohio, 1991)
Franklin v. Union Mortgage Co. (In Re Franklin)
126 B.R. 702 (N.D. Mississippi, 1991)
First of America Bank v. Gaylor (In Re Gaylor)
123 B.R. 236 (E.D. Michigan, 1991)
In Re Zobenica
109 B.R. 814 (W.D. Tennessee, 1990)
Donahue v. Parker (In Re Donahue)
110 B.R. 41 (D. Kansas, 1990)
D'Angona v. Marine Midland Bank (In Re D'Angona)
107 B.R. 448 (D. Connecticut, 1989)
Larson v. Alliance Bank (In Re Larson)
99 B.R. 1 (D. Alaska, 1989)
Dewsnup v. Timm (In Re Dewsnup)
87 B.R. 676 (D. Utah, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 B.R. 650, 1987 Bankr. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-vermont-federal-savings-loan-assn-in-re-smith-mdb-1987.