Smith v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

20 F. App'x 178
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 2001
Docket01-1176
StatusUnpublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 178 (Smith v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 20 F. App'x 178 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Yawa Sedodo Smith, a native and citizen of Ghana, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying her application for suspension of deportation. We have reviewed the record and the Board’s decision and conclude that Smith is ineligible for that relief because she failed to accrue seven years of continuous physical presence prior to the initiation of deportation proceedings against her. See Ram v. INS, 243 F.3d 510, 518 (9th Cir.2001); McBride v. INS, 238 F.3d 371, 375-77 (5th Cir. 2001); Afolayan v. INS, 219 F.3d 784, 788-89 (8th Cir.2000). Accordingly, we affirm the Board’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. App'x 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2001.