Smith v. University of Rochester Medical Center

32 A.D.2d 736, 301 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4000
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 15, 1969
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 32 A.D.2d 736 (Smith v. University of Rochester Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. University of Rochester Medical Center, 32 A.D.2d 736, 301 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4000 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion granted to the extent that plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint is granted in all respects, except as to the additional cause of action for breach of warranty against University of Rochester Medical Center. Memorandum: In this action brought for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering against a hospital, the attending physician and an equipment supplier, plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint by (1) increasing the ad damnum clause of the complaint to $450,000 for wrongful death and $50,000 for pain and suffering, (2) to allege a partnership between the defendant Howe and a fellow practitioner, and (3) to add a cause of action for breach of warranty against the hospital. In the absence of laches and a failure of any prejudice to the defendants, it was an improvident exercise of discretion to deny leave to amend the ad damnum clause. The mere lapse of time, without more, is not sufficient ground for [737]*737denial of the motion. There was' neither surprise nor prejudice shown as to plaintiff’s request to enlarge and clearly specify the negligence charged against defendant Howe, and it further appears that trial was not imminent. However, as to the request to add the cause of action for breach of warranty against the hospital, such an amendment is not proper. (See Perlmutter v. Beth David Hosp., 308 N. Y. 100; Mamunes v. Williamsburgh Gen. Hosp., 28 A D 2d 998, affd. 23 N Y 2d 757.) (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term, denying motion to amend complaint.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Yecchio, Marsh, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cardy v. Frey
86 A.D.2d 968 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Doell v. County of Monroe
86 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Harris v. Pullman's Bar & Grill, Inc.
74 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Allen v. Pohl
63 A.D.2d 1118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Adams v. Burkowski
61 A.D.2d 1134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Bilhorn v. Farlow
60 A.D.2d 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Gregoire v. Hyman
59 A.D.2d 1029 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Finn v. Crystal Beach Transit Co.
55 A.D.2d 1001 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Gardner v. Fyr-Fyter Co.
55 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Earner v. Shook
51 A.D.2d 855 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 A.D.2d 736, 301 N.Y.S.2d 933, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-university-of-rochester-medical-center-nyappdiv-1969.