Smith v. United States Postal Service
This text of 17 F. App'x 707 (Smith v. United States Postal Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jewell Smith, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion for reconsideration of the judgment dismissing Smith’s action for failure to prosecute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion an order denying a Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, Molloy v. Wilson, 878 F.2d 313, 315 (9th Cir.1989), and we affirm.
The district court properly denied Smith’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion because Smith failed to show that circumstances beyond his control prevented him from taking timely action to protect his interests. See United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir, Co., 984 F.2d 1047, 1049 (9th Cir.1993).
Smith’s remaining contentions lack merit, and we deny all pending motions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 F. App'x 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-postal-service-ca9-2001.