Smith v. United States of American Air Force

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. United States of American Air Force

136 F. App'x 575

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1486

StatusPublished

This text of 136 F. App'x 575 (Smith v. United States of American Air Force) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. United States of American Air Force, 136 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Thomas C. Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. United States of Am. Air Force, No. CA-04-121-4 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 9 & entered Feb. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Thomas C. Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Smith v. United States of Am. Air Force, No. CA-04-121-4 (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 9 & entered Feb. 10, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 F. App'x 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-of-american-air-force-ca4-2005.