Smith v. United States
This text of Smith v. United States (Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUL 30 2010 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Clerk us' COurts" . District. &8ankruptcy for the Dist net of COlumbia KEITH SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 10 1299 ) THE UNITED STATES, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis
and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint will be dismissed.
Plaintiff alleges that he has been kidnapped and is held illegally in a private prison, the
Wheeler Correctional Facility in Alamo, Georgia. Among other relief, plaintiff demands
unspecified injunctive relief and $20 million in damages.
Because plaintiffs claims go to the fact of his incarceration, he cannot recover damages
in this civil rights action without showing that his confinement has been invalidated by
"revers[al] on direct appeal, expunge[ment] by executive order, declar[ation of invalidity] by a
state tribunal authorized to make such determination, or ... a federal court's issuance of a writ of
habeas corpus." Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477,486-87 (1994); accord White v. Bowie, 194
F.3d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (table). Plaintiff has not satisfied this prerequisite and therefore his
complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can granted. This action will be dismissed
under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(8)(ii) and 1915A(b)(1). An Order is issued separately.
/
/4\
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-dcd-2010.