Smith v. United States

419 A.2d 976, 1980 D.C. App. LEXIS 356
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 D.C. App. LEXIS 399
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided July 23, 1980·No. No. 11901; CR 53905-76·Published

Opinion

[977]*977ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on for consideration of appellee’s suggestion of death, counsel for appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to remand this cause with instructions to dismiss the indictment. In light of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s aforesaid motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to remand this cause with instructions to dismiss the indictment is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the appeal is hereby dismissed. See Harvey v. United States, D.C.App., 385 A.2d 36 (1978).

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and KELLY,* KERN, GALLAGHER, NEBEKER,* HARRIS,* MACK, FERREN and PRYOR, Associate Judges.

ORDER

This cause came on for consideration of appellee’s suggestion of death, counsel for appellant’s motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and to remand this cause with instructions to dismiss the indictment and the petition for hearing said motion en banc. It appearing that a majority of the court has voted to deny the petition for hearing appellant’s motion en banc, it is

ORDERED that counsel for appellant’s petition for en banc consideration of the motion is denied.

NEWMAN, C. J., and KELLY, MACK and FERREN, JJ., would grant the en banc petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. United States, 419 A.2d 976, 1980 D.C. App. LEXIS 356 (D.C. 1980).

419 A.2d 976 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harvey v. United States
385 A.2d 36 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1978)