Smith v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 626, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2142
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 60 Cust. Ct. 535
United States Customs Court·Decided November 15, 1968·No. V.D. 146; Entry No. 11910, etc.·Published

Opinion

Newman, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these cases, enumerated in schedule “A”, hereto attached and made a part hereof,

[627]*627consists of synthetic rubber articles, which were the subject of the decision of the first division of this court in R. W Smith & Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 538, C.D. 3223, wherein it was concluded that since the footwear involved herein is dutiable under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, appraisement on the basis of American selling price is null and void; that the liquidations of the entries based upon the void appraisements are likewise void, and the protests filed against them premature; and that accordingly said protests must be dismissed, and remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper duitable values under the provisions of 28 U.S.C., section 2636(d). Consequently, these cases are before me on remand from the classification proceedings in the above cited case.

Stipulated facts, upon which these cases have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value in each case is the entered unit values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 626, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2142 (cusc 1968).

61 Cust. Ct. 626 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

R. W. Smith & Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 538 (U.S. Customs Court, 1967)