Smith v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 318
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 1956
DocketNo. 59637; protests 186678-K and 187211-K (Galveston)
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 318 (Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 318 (cusc 1956).

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of seamless steel A. P. I. casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al. v. United States (32 Cust. Ct. 32, C. D. 1577), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. United States
32 Cust. Ct. 32 (U.S. Customs Court, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cust. Ct. 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-cusc-1956.