Smith v. United States

29 Cust. Ct. 389, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1587
United States Customs Court·Decided October 16, 1952·No. No. 56907; protest 139901-K (Galveston)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It appeared that duty was assessed upon the basis of the invoiced value of a complete set of radar equipment, there being 12 boxes entered. It developed that two boxes containing parts of said set were not contained in the shipment and were later imported. Duty was also assessed upon the latter importation at the ad valorem rate upon the basis of the invoiced value of the parts imported. Thus, duty was again assessed upon the parts contained in the two boxes not a part of the original shipment. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues and facts are similar in all material respects to those involved in United States v. Browne Vintners Co., Inc. (34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), it was held that all duties levied and collected upon the two cases of radar equipment not shipped as a part of the radar set, upon which duty was again collected when subsequently entered, should be refunded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. United States, 29 Cust. Ct. 389, 1952 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1587 (cusc 1952).

29 Cust. Ct. 389 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.