Smith v. United States
168 F. 462, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided March 16, 1909·No. No. 5,192·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
I concur with the Board of General Appraisers in the conclusion that the phrase “meats of all kinds” is broad enough to cover, not only the quail, lark, and young chickens put up in tins as described, but also the livers of chickens and geese, [464]*464as well as those of steers, and that the phrase “prepared or preserved” covers them when compounded as in páté de foie gras.
The decision of the board is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. United States, 168 F. 462, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399 (circtsdny 1909).
168 F. 462 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Opinion No. (1985)
Nebraska Attorney General Reports, 1985
Perdue, Inc. v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation
286 A.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1972)
Dutch Cheese Importers Co. v. United States
23 Cust. Ct. 98 (U.S. Customs Court, 1949)
Obrecht v. United States
10 Cust. Ct. 127 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)
Nootka Packing Co. v. United States
22 C.C.P.A. 464 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1935)
United States v. General Hide & Skin Corp.
11 Ct. Cust. 78 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1921)