Smith v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Smith v. United States

168 F. 462, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedMarch 16, 1909

DocketNo. 5,192

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 168 F. 462 (Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. United States, 168 F. 462, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399 (circtsdny 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

BACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I concur with the Board of General Appraisers in the conclusion that the phrase “meats of all kinds” is broad enough to cover, not only the quail, lark, and young chickens put up in tins as described, but also the livers of chickens and geese, [464]*464as well as those of steers, and that the phrase “prepared or preserved” covers them when compounded as in páté de foie gras.

The decision of the board is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I concur with the Board of General Appraisers in the conclusion that the phrase “meats of all kinds” is broad enough to cover, not only the quail, lark, and young chickens put up in tins as described, but also the livers of chickens and geese, [464]*464as well as those of steers, and that the phrase “prepared or preserved” covers them when compounded as in páté de foie gras.

The decision of the board is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

168 F. 462, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-circtsdny-1909.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack