Smith v. United States

255 F. 992, 167 C.C.A. 670, 4 Alaska Fed. 734, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1567
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 231 F. 25
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 3, 1919·No. No. 3264·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for dismissal of writ of error for noncompliance by the plaintiff in error with the provisions of subdivision 1 of rule 16 of the Rules of Practice of this court (208 Fed. ix, 124 C.C.A. ix) granted, and writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. United States, 255 F. 992, 167 C.C.A. 670, 4 Alaska Fed. 734, 1919 U.S. App. LEXIS 1567 (9th Cir. 1919).

255 F. 992 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.