Smith v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Smith v. United States

180 F.2d 851, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1950

Docket11022_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 180 F.2d 851 (Smith v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. United States, 180 F.2d 851, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of tihe District Judge in denying appellant’s motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was. not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of tihe District Judge in denying appellant’s motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was. not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 F.2d 851, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-united-states-ca6-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack