Smith v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Smith v. United States

180 F.2d 851, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1950·No. 11022_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of tihe District Judge in denying appellant’s motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was. not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties; and the court being of the opinion that the action of tihe District Judge in denying appellant’s motion to permit her to withdraw her plea of guilty and to set aside the judgment of conviction was. not an abuse of his discretion in the matter; Rule 32(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; Katz v. United States, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 869; United States v. Mignogna, 2 Cir., 157 F.2d 839, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and is affirmed.

Smith v. United States, 180 F.2d 851, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 2509 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

180 F.2d 851 (Smith v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related