Smith v. United States

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

July 22, 1996

                                [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]



                            UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                                FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

                                 ____________________


No. 95-2237

        No. 95-2238


RUSSELL J. SMITH,



                                Plaintiff, Appellant,



                                          v.



                              UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,



                                 Defendant, Appellee.


____________________



                    APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



                           FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND



                    [Hon. Ronald R. Lagueux, U.S. District Judge]
                                             ___________________



                                 ____________________



                                        Before



                                Torruella, Chief Judge,
                                           ___________

                           Cyr and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
                                           ______________



                                 ____________________



            Russell J. Smith on brief pro se.
            ________________

            Sheldon  Whitehouse,   United  States  Attorney,  and  Kenneth  P.
            ___________________                                    ___________

        Madden, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
        ______


____________________


____________________


Per  Curiam.  On the  basis of United  States v. Ursery,
                 ___________                    ______________    ______



___ S. Ct. ___, 1996 WL 340815 (June 24, 1996),  in which the



            Supreme Court rejected a double jeopardy claim similar to the



            one advanced here,  the judgment is summarily  affirmed.  See
                                                           ________   ___



            Loc. R. 27.1. 


-2-