Smith v. Union Parish School Board

83 So. 2d 131, 228 La. 570, 1955 La. LEXIS 1389
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 30, 1955·No. No. 40460·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

Mrs. Katie Crow Smith instituted suit against the Union Parish School Board, in which suit she was joined by her husband, E. F. Smith, to recover $2,100, claimed to be due her under an oral contract of employment as a school teacher in the public schools of that Parish for the school year 19.48-1949, the Board having dispensed with her services without a hearing; they are appealing from the judgment of the lower court dismissing the suit on defendant’s exceptions of no cause or right of action.

The argument of appellants’ counsel that the trial judge erroneously maintained the exceptions and dismissed the plaintiffs’ suit because, according to the allegations of the petition,1 “ * * * Mrs. Smith was qualified as a permanent. teacher, and could not be discharged, after having been hired, without a hearing, * * * ” is untenable in the light of the fact that Mrs. Smith, in answer to defendant’s prayer for oyer, produced two certificates, one dated September 1, 1914, valid for five years, the other a Type “T” Trade Certificate, valid for the school year 1947-1948 — clearly showing that she is not a “teacher” within the meaning of the Teachers’ Tenure Act2 and therefore could not legally be hired as a teacher by the School Board3 nor be paid for her services as a teacher.4 See State ex rel. Sibley v. Ascension Parish School Board, 222 La. 923, 64 So.2d 221.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Union Parish School Board, 83 So. 2d 131, 228 La. 570, 1955 La. LEXIS 1389 (La. 1955).

83 So. 2d 131 (Smith v. Union Parish School Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Garner v. Louisiana State Board of Education
277 So. 2d 492 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1973)