Smith v. Union Insurance
This text of 120 Mass. 90 (Smith v. Union Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the conveyance of the premises and the assignment of the policy, with the assent of the insurance company, from Smith to Bigelow, Bigelow became the owner of the property and the assured in the policy. The order, afterwards indorsed by him upon the policy, did not make the plaintiff the assignee of the policy, nor the party insured thereby, but merely the payee in case of loss. The subsequent conveyance and sale of the property by Bigelow, without the assent of the company, avoided the policy, so that neither the plaintiff nor any other person can maintain an action thereon. Bates v. Equitable Ins. Co. 10 Wall. 33. Loring v. Manufacturers' Ins. Co. 8 Gray, 28. Lawrence v. Holyoke Ins. Co. 11 Allen, 387. Atherton v Phœnix Ins. Co. 109 Mass. 32. Franklin Savings Institution v. Central Ins. Co. 119 Mass. 240. Judgment for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
120 Mass. 90, 1876 Mass. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-union-insurance-mass-1876.