Smith v. Tydings

131 So. 319, 100 Fla. 1414
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 9, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 131 So. 319 (Smith v. Tydings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Tydings, 131 So. 319, 100 Fla. 1414 (Fla. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant filed bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Marion County claiming a lien on certain property of the appellee Tydings in the hands of Stokes as Trustee, and also upon certain real estate, which lien was claimed for his services as an attorney in a suit which he had heretofore prosecuted in the Circuit Court and the Supreme Court on behalf of the appellee, in which suit final settlement was made between the parties before the final decree as to their respective rights therein, and which suit was dismissed upon stipulation and agreement between the parties before final decree.

A demurrer to the bill of complaint was sustained.

The allegations of the bill of complaint are insufficient to establish the existence of a lien in favor of the complainant in the court below against the defendant in the court below.

*1415 The bill of complaint shows upon its face that the complainant had a complete and adequate remedy at law and the bill .was without equity.

The judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J. concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel Mones, PA v. Smith
486 So. 2d 559 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Billingham v. Thiele
107 So. 2d 238 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Guthrie v. Home Building & Loan Co.
156 So. 882 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 So. 319, 100 Fla. 1414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-tydings-fla-1930.