Smith v. Turley

6 Ky. 188, 3 Bibb 188, 1813 Ky. LEXIS 82
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedOctober 13, 1813
StatusPublished

This text of 6 Ky. 188 (Smith v. Turley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. Turley, 6 Ky. 188, 3 Bibb 188, 1813 Ky. LEXIS 82 (Ky. Ct. App. 1813).

Opinion

OPINION of the Court, by

judge Owsley

Smith obtained from a justice of the peace a warrant for a forcible detainer against Turley. The jury summoned on the inquisition, found Turley not guilty, whereupon judgment was awarded him by the justice.

Smith, according to the provision of the act regulating such proceedings, filed a traverse, and brought the cause before the circuit court. That court, on the motion of Turley, quashed the traverse and dismissed the cause. Fqr what causes of irregularity the cause was dismissed, does not appear from the record. It is, however, objected, that the bond given upon filing the traverse, does not appear to have been regularly executed, because it appears to have been signed by-Smith’s agent, without his authority appearing in the the record. The bond appears to have been taken a? the law requires by the justice before whom the inquest was had. The failure then to file the authority under which the agent executed the bond, surely cannot justify a quashal of the traverse and dismissing the cause, when the justice has certified the bond to have been approved by and acknowledged before him. • Besides, the bond was regularly executed by Smith’s security. The judgment of the circuit court, therefore, is erroneous and must be reversed with cos,ts. The cause remanded for further proceedings to be had upon the traverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ky. 188, 3 Bibb 188, 1813 Ky. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-turley-kyctapp-1813.