Smith v. Tubal
This text of Smith v. Tubal (Smith v. Tubal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000782 08-APR-2015 12:56 PM
SCWC-14-0000782
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
LEX R. SMITH and CYNTHIA M. NOJIMA,
Respondents/Plaintiffs-Appellees,
vs.
JERRY TUBAL,
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-14-0000782; CASE NO. 1RC13-1-2385)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ., and
Circuit Judge Toʻotoʻo, in place of McKenna, J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jerry Tubal’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on February 26, 2015,
is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 8, 2015.
Anthony P. Locricchio /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Jesse W. Schiel for respondents /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Faʻauuga Toʻotoʻo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Smith v. Tubal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-tubal-haw-2015.