Smith v. Trepel Florist, Inc.
231 A.D. 844
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
This text of 231 A.D. 844 (Smith v. Trepel Florist, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. Trepel Florist, Inc., 231 A.D. 844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
Opinion
Judgment against appellant, A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, upon the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a cause of action against said appell nt. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-trepel-florist-inc-nyappdiv-1930.