Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.

20 N.J.L. 116

DecidedFebruary 15, 1843

StatusPublished

This text of 20 N.J.L. 116 (Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Trenton Delaware Falls Co., 20 N.J.L. 116 (N.J. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

No writ of execution can be sealed or recorded until the rule for judgment, is actually entered in the minutes of the court; any other practice is contrary to the statute. Elm. Dig. 486, art. 2.

Upon the call of the bar, a counsellor can make no motions for or in . behalf of a younger counsellor, before the name of the latter is called, unless such senior counsellor is actually of counsel in the cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No writ of execution can be sealed or recorded until the rule for judgment, is actually entered in the minutes of the court; any other practice is contrary to the statute. Elm. Dig. 486, art. 2.

Upon the call of the bar, a counsellor can make no motions for or in . behalf of a younger counsellor, before the name of the latter is called, unless such senior counsellor is actually of counsel in the cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 N.J.L. 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-trenton-delaware-falls-co-nj-1843.