Smith v. Travelers' Ins.

73 F. 513, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2650
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania·Decided March 23, 1896·No. No. 70·Published

Opinion

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

In Railroad Co. v. McLean, 108 U. S. 212, 2 Sup. Ct. 498, the sujireme court distinctly ruled that if, upon the first removal, (he federal court declines to proceed, and remands the cause, because of the failure to file a copy of the record in due time, the same party is not entitled to file in the state court a second petition for removal, upon the same ground. In Johnston v. Don-van, 30 Fed. 395, this principle was applied to a second removal upon the ground of diverse citizenship. We feel constrained, then, to sustain this objection. Whether the other objections to the removal are well taken, need not be considered. The cause is remanded to the court of common pleas 2To. 1 of Philadelphia county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Travelers' Ins., 73 F. 513, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2650 (E.D. Pa. 1896).

73 F. 513 (Smith v. Travelers' Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Paul & Chicago Railway Co. v. McLean
108 U.S. 212 (Supreme Court, 1883)
Johnston v. Donvan
30 F. 395 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1887)