Smith v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
241 A.2d 879, 156 Conn. 658
Opinion
It appearing that the plaintiff in the above-entitled case has failed to prosecute her appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo motu, that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed.
The appellant filed a motion for reargument which was denied.-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 241 A.2d 879, 156 Conn. 658 (Colo. 1968).
241 A.2d 879 (Smith v. Travelers Indemnity Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.