Smith v. Thomas

193 S.E. 51, 184 S.C. 498, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 180
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided October 7, 1937·No. 14541·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

This is an action in claim and delivery in the usual form for possession of one Ford truck and Great Dane trailer bottomed upon a past-due purchase-price mortgage. The mortgagors (appellants) are residents and citizens of Colleton County, and the personal property above described is usually kept, that is, stored when not in use, in Colleton County. While the property was temporarily in Jasper *500 County, this action was commenced in said last-mentioned county, and the truck and trailer seized by the sheriff of that county.

The appellants moved for an order changing the place of trial from Jasper to Colleton County based on the facts stated above, which motion was refused, and this appeal followed.

We are of the opinion that the cases cited by Hon. J. Henry Johnson, Circuit Judge, in his order refusing the motion, which order will be reported, are controlling, and that the exception should be, and it is hereby, overruled.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chibe Justice Stabler and Messrs. Justices Boni-iam and FishburnE concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Thomas, 193 S.E. 51, 184 S.C. 498, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 180 (S.C. 1937).

193 S.E. 51 (Smith v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CAYE & CO., INC. v. Saul
92 S.E.2d 696 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1956)