Smith v. The Mattie May

45 F. 899, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266
District Court, D. South Carolina·Decided April 22, 1891·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Simonton, J.

The libel is in rem for sum due to the stevedore who loaded the vessel. Claimant excepts to the jurisdiction. The services were performed upon the vessel, afloat in Georgetown harbor, and were maritime in their character. This court follows The Canada, 7 Fed. Rep. 119; The Senator, 21 Fed. Rep. 191; The Gilbert Knapp, 37 Fed. Rep. 209. Exception overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. The Mattie May, 45 F. 899, 1891 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 266 (D.S.C. 1891).

45 F. 899 (Smith v. The Mattie May) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rupert City
213 F. 263 (W.D. Washington, 1914)
The Chicklade
120 F. 1003 (E.D. Virginia, 1903)
Vanhoesen v. The Seguranca
58 F. 908 (S.D. New York, 1893)