Smith v. Taecker

15 P.2d 193, 127 Cal. App. 78, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 290
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 17, 1932·No. Docket No. 1031.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[1] A motion to dismiss this appeal was made upon the ground of the failure of appellant to file his opening brief within the time prescribed. The transcript was filed in this court on July 22, 1932. Notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on September 17, 1932, the time for hearing being set for October 11, 1932. On September 19, 1932, copies of the opening brief were sent by appellant to respondents and on September 24, 1932, the original brief with a copy was sent to the county clerk with the request that the original be returned. On October 8, 1932, this original brief was returned to counsel by the county clerk and on October 10, 1932, the same was filed in this court. Upon the authority of Tyner v. Axt, 111 Cal.App. 187 [295 P. 97],Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal.App. 55 [297 P. 564], Snodgrass v. Hand, 125 Cal.App. 265 [13 P.2d 769], and Robinson v. El Centro Grain Co. et al., 125 Cal.App. 416 [13 P.2d 965], the motion to dismiss is denied.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

*Page 79

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Taecker, 15 P.2d 193, 127 Cal. App. 78, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 290 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

15 P.2d 193 (Smith v. Taecker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hotels El Rancho, Inc. v. Pray
176 P.2d 236 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1947)
Lisle v. Ragle
52 P.2d 608 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Silva v. Co-operative Dairymen's League
42 P.2d 370 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)