Smith v. Taecker

California Court of Appeal

Smith v. Taecker

127 Cal. App. 78

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 17, 1932

DocketCiv. No. 1031

StatusPublished

This text of 127 Cal. App. 78 (Smith v. Taecker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Taecker, 127 Cal. App. 78 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal was made upon the ground of the failure of appellant to file his opening brief within the time prescribed. The transcript was filed in this court on July 22, 1932. Notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on September 17, 1932, the time for hearing being set for October 11, 1932. On September 19, 1932, copies of the opening brief were sent by appellant to respondents and on September 24, 1932, the original brief with a copy was sent to the county clerk with the request that the original be returned. On October 8, 1932, this original brief was returned to counsel by the county clerk and on October 10, 1932, the same was filed in this court. Upon the authority of Tyner v. Axt, 111 Cal. App. 187 [295 Pac. 97], Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564], Snodgrass v. Hand, 125 Cal. App. 265 [13 Pac. (2d) 769], and BoMnson v. El Centro Grain Co. et al., 125 Cal. App. 416 [13 Pac. (2d) 965], the motion to dismiss is denied.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BARNARD, P. J.

A motion to dismiss this appeal was made upon the ground of the failure of appellant to file his opening brief within the time prescribed. The transcript was filed in this court on July 22, 1932. Notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was filed on September 17, 1932, the time for hearing being set for October 11, 1932. On September 19, 1932, copies of the opening brief were sent by appellant to respondents and on September 24, 1932, the original brief with a copy was sent to the county clerk with the request that the original be returned. On October 8, 1932, this original brief was returned to counsel by the county clerk and on October 10, 1932, the same was filed in this court. Upon the authority of Tyner v. Axt, 111 Cal. App. 187 [295 Pac. 97], Toth v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 113 Cal. App. 55 [297 Pac. 564], Snodgrass v. Hand, 125 Cal. App. 265 [13 Pac. (2d) 769], and BoMnson v. El Centro Grain Co. et al., 125 Cal. App. 416 [13 Pac. (2d) 965], the motion to dismiss is denied.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 Cal. App. 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-taecker-calctapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack