Smith v. Swinehart

209 Ill. App. 175
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided December 21, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,927·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice Barnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Dentists, § 3*—when immaterial whether dental employee is licensed. Whether or not an employee of a dentist was a licensed dentist was immaterial in an action against the dentist to recover for negligent work done by the employee working in defendant’s office for him or under his direction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Swinehart, 209 Ill. App. 175 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

209 Ill. App. 175 (Smith v. Swinehart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp.
197 S.W.2d 798 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1946)
Moulton v. Huckleberry
46 P.2d 589 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1935)
Noren v. American School of Osteopathy
2 S.W.2d 215 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1928)
Ley v. Bishopp
263 P. 369 (California Court of Appeal, 1928)