Smith v. Supreme Court of Appeals

Fourth Circuit

Smith v. Supreme Court of Appeals

82 F. App'x 847

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedDecember 19, 2003

DocketNo. 03-2233, 03-2243, 03-2244

StatusPublished

This text of 82 F. App'x 847 (Smith v. Supreme Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Supreme Court of Appeals, 82 F. App'x 847 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Gregory W. Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the petitions for writs of mandamus as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Gregory W. Smith appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to dismiss the petitions for writs of mandamus as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 F. App'x 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-supreme-court-of-appeals-ca4-2003.