Smith v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Smith v. Superior Court

124 Cal. App. 685

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 12, 1932

DocketCiv. No. 8055

StatusPublished

This text of 124 Cal. App. 685 (Smith v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. Superior Court, 124 Cal. App. 685 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

It appearing that although several months have expired since the alternative writ of prohibition was issued herein, and that in the absence of either stipulation by the parties hereto, or by order of this court, respondent has entered no appearance, either by answer to the petition for the writ, or by memorandum of points and authorities in relation thereto;

And it further appearing by the uncontradicted facts set forth in the petition for said writ, as well as by the law which is pertinent to the relief prayed for by petitioner, that his claim is well founded:

It is ordered that the alternative writ hereinbefore issued by order of this court be and the same is made peremptory.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

It appearing that although several months have expired since the alternative writ of prohibition was issued herein, and that in the absence of either stipulation by the parties hereto, or by order of this court, respondent has entered no appearance, either by answer to the petition for the writ, or by memorandum of points and authorities in relation thereto;

And it further appearing by the uncontradicted facts set forth in the petition for said writ, as well as by the law which is pertinent to the relief prayed for by petitioner, that his claim is well founded:

It is ordered that the alternative writ hereinbefore issued by order of this court be and the same is made peremptory.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Cal. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-superior-court-calctapp-1932.