Smith v. Superior Court

13 P.2d 400, 124 Cal. App. 685, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 919
California Court of Appeal·Decided July 12, 1932·No. Docket No. 8055.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] It appearing that although several months have expired since the alternative writ of prohibition was issued herein, and that in the absence of either stipulation by the parties hereto, or by order of this court, respondent has entered no appearance, either by answer to the petition for the writ, or by memorandum of points and authorities in relation thereto;

And it further appearing by the uncontradicted facts set forth in the petition for said writ, as well as by the law which is pertinent to the relief prayed for by petitioner, that his claim is well founded:

It is ordered that the alternative writ hereinbefore issued by order of this court be and the same is made peremptory. *Page 686

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. Superior Court, 13 P.2d 400, 124 Cal. App. 685, 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 919 (Cal. Ct. App. 1932).

13 P.2d 400 (Smith v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldman v. Superior Court
268 P.2d 134 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)