Smith v. Stevens
This text of 822 S.W.2d 152 (Smith v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant, Willie Smith, a state prison inmate, sued a prison guard, Dale Stephens, for $3.55 in actual damages, an injunction, and a declaratory judgment. Smith claims Stephens took his coffee bag and two packs of cigarettes. Six days after Smith sued, the trial court found the suit was frivolous and dismissed it with prejudice, pursuant to Tex.Civ.PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.001 (Vernon Supp.1991). We affirm.
De minimus non curiat lex. The law cares not for small things. Black’s Law Dictionary 388 (5th ed. 1979). Any error is harmless because the amount of actual damages is insignificant. Thompson v. Mannix, 814 S.W.2d 811, 812 (Tex.App.—Waco 1991, no writ); Birdo v. Ament, 814 S.W.2d 808, 810 (Tex.App.—Waco 1991, writ requested).
This appeal is frivolous. We assess damages against Smith of $1420.00, which equals ten times the taxable costs. Tex. R.App.P. 84.
*153 The judgment is affirmed. Costs are assessed against Smith in amount of $1420.00.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
822 S.W.2d 152, 1991 WL 248680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-stevens-texapp-1991.