Smith v. Stephan
This text of 250 A.D. 819 (Smith v. Stephan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On reargument order of peremptory mandamus affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We find section 23 of the Civil Service Law (as amd. by Laws of 1934, chap. 366) applicable to this proceeding. All concur. (The order directs reinstatement of petitioner as police officer.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgeomb, Thompson, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ. [See 248 App. Div. 666; 249 id. 796.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 819, 294 N.Y.S. 750, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-stephan-nyappdiv-1937.