Smith v. State

163 N.W.2d 8, 41 Wis. 2d 145, 1968 Wisc. LEXIS 858
Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 1968·No. State 14·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mr. Justice Connor T. Hansen having taken no part in the decision upon this writ of error to review the judgment and the other members of the court being equally divided on the question of whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, Mr. Chief Justice Hallows, Mr. Justice Wilkie, and Mr. Justice Heffernan being of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed or a new trial ordered, and Mr. Justice Beil-fuss, Mr. Justice Hanley, and Mr. Justice Robert W. Hansen being of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed under the rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Connor T. Hansen, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 163 N.W.2d 8, 41 Wis. 2d 145, 1968 Wisc. LEXIS 858 (Wis. 1968).

163 N.W.2d 8 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott Smith v. Greg Kleynerman
2017 WI 22 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2017)
Digicorp, Inc. v. AMERITECH CORP.
2003 WI 54 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 2003)