Smith v. State

126 S.W.2d 490

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 131 Tex. Crim. 322 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 22, 1939·No. No. 20305·Published

Opinion

^ KRUEGER, Judge.

■ Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. Punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of five days and a fine of $50.

. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

^ KRUEGER, Judge.

■ Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated. Punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of five days and a fine of $50.

. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and all procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Smith v. State, 126 S.W.2d 490 (Tex. 1939).

Pincite

126 S.W.2d 490 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.