Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Smith v. State

23 S.W.2d 731, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1057, 1930 WL 2655

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 15, 1930

DocketNo. 12915

StatusPublished

This text of 23 S.W.2d 731 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 23 S.W.2d 731, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1057, 1930 WL 2655 (Tex. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to sufficiently charge the offense, and is followed by the charge of the court, the judgment, and sentence. Notation of exceptions on refused motions to quash, and to require the state to elect, is not tantamount to a bill of exceptions.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears to sufficiently charge the offense, and is followed by the charge of the court, the judgment, and sentence. Notation of exceptions on refused motions to quash, and to require the state to elect, is not tantamount to a bill of exceptions.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 S.W.2d 731, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1057, 1930 WL 2655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.