Smith v. State

18 S.W.2d 674, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Tex. Crim. 616
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 6, 1929·No. No. 12324·Published

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, J.

This case is before us on a writ of error. Review of a final judgment forfeiting an appearance bond is sought.

For a discussion of the questions presented by the record herein, see opinion No. 12313, Louise Magless et al. v. State of Texas, 18 S.W.(2d) 669, opinion rendered March 6, 1929, and not yet [officially] reported. Practically the same questions being involved as were presented in the case referred to, the judgment here must also be affirmed. The judgment of the court below is reformed, so as to bear no interest.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 18 S.W.2d 674, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 992 (Tex. 1929).

18 S.W.2d 674 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Magless v. State
18 S.W.2d 669 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Smith v. State
18 S.W.2d 672 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1929)