Smith v. State

13 S.W.2d 854, 112 Tex. Crim. 136, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 253
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 1929·No. No. 12459.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is operating a pool hall denounced by Art. 653, P. C., 1925; penalty fixed at a fine of $25.00.

The trial took place in the county court upon an information filed by the county attorney. A prosecution upon an information is authorized only when the information is based upon a sworn complaint. See Art. 415, C. C. P., 1925. In the absence of the complaint, the prosecution cannot stand. The judgment of conviction is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., p. 269, sec. 520; Compton v. State, 158 S. W. 515; McDonald v. State, 216 S. W. 166; Thomas v. State, 298 S. W. 590; Art. 415, Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P., 1925, Vol. 1, 1928 Annual Pocket Part, p. 23, note 5.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 13 S.W.2d 854, 112 Tex. Crim. 136, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 253 (Tex. 1929).

13 S.W.2d 854 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. State
60 S.W.2d 771 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1933)