Smith v. State
182 S.W. 337
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Tex. Crim. 145 →
Opinion
Appellant appealed from a conviction for bigamy, but has neither a statement of facts nor a bill of exceptions. No question is presented which can be reviewed in the absence of these. Therefore the judgment must necessarily be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 182 S.W. 337 (Tex. 1916).
182 S.W. 337 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.