Smith v. State

182 S.W. 310, 78 Tex. Crim. 589, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 34
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 73 Tex. Crim. 145
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 1916·No. No. 3923.·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of vagrancy. The ease arose in the Justice Court. On conviction in that court, an appeal was prosecuted to the County Court, where the jury convicted and awarded appellant a fine of $100.

Motion is made here to dismiss the appeal on the ground that before the jurisdiction of this court will attach on appeal from the County Court the punishment, if it be a fine, must be in excess of $100; that unless it exceeds $100 the jurisdiction of the County Court is final. This seems to be a correct proposition. See article 87 of the Eevised Code of Criminal Procedure, and numerous authorities collated in the mote under that article.

The motion to dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated is granted, .and the appeal is dismissed;

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 182 S.W. 310, 78 Tex. Crim. 589, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 34 (Tex. 1916).

182 S.W. 310 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.