Smith v. State

18 Tex. Ct. App. 329, 1885 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Tex. Ct. App. 107
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 3, 1885·No. No. 3613·Published

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

Defendant’s special plea of former conviction was well pleaded, and the court submitted the issue thereon to the jury, but the verdict does not determine that issue. When a special plea is submitted to the jury the verdict must expressly determine whether such plea is true or untrue. (Code Crim. Proc., art. 712; Davis v. The State, 42 Texas, 494; Deaton v. The State, 44 Texas, 446; Brown v. The State, 7 Texas Ct. App., 619; McCampbell v. The State, 9 Texas Ct. App., 124; Pickens v. The State, 9 Texas Ct. App., 270; White v. The State, 9 Texas Ct. App., 390.)

Because of this error in the proceedings the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Beversed and remanded.

[Opinion delivered June 3, 1885.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 18 Tex. Ct. App. 329, 1885 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 102 (Tex. Ct. App. 1885).

18 Tex. Ct. App. 329 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. State
42 Tex. 494 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)
Deaton v. State
44 Tex. 446 (Texas Supreme Court, 1876)