Smith v. State

1933 OK CR 70, 23 P.2d 506, 54 Okla. Crim. 452, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 52 Okla. Crim. 315
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 30, 1933·No. No. A-8490.·Published

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Grady county of manslaughter in the first degree, and was-sentenced to- serve a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

The homicide occurred in August, 1931. Trial was in May, 1932. The appeal was lodged in this court in October, 1932. No briefs in support of the appeal have been filed.

We have read the record with care. The evidence discloses that, at the time charged, defendant, with a pistol, shot and killed one Edith Jones, who was the wife of Mays Jones, companion of defendant at the time. It appears they were pursuing Neal Parnell, who was joy-riding with Edith Jones. Defendant, it appears, took it upon himself to avenge a real or apparent marital wrong done Mays Jones, and shot at Neal Parnell, and in doing so killed Edith Jones. He defended on the ground of self-defense. The jury evidently did not believe the defense. The evidence fully sustains the judgment. The punishment assessed is lenient. No error of any consequence occurred at the trial.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 1933 OK CR 70, 23 P.2d 506, 54 Okla. Crim. 452, 1933 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 136 (Okla. Ct. App. 1933).

1933 OK CR 70 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.