Smith v. State
This text of 233 P. 246 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Several assignments of error are presented; among them, that the county court was without jurisdiction for the reason that the offense charged is a felony, and, as we view this contention, it will dispose of the case. The other assignments will not be noticed. Under the provisions of section 2064, Comp. Statutes 1921, second subdivision, it is provided ithat burglary in the second degree is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, not exceeding seven years, and not less than two-years. The statute providing punishment for attempts to commit crimes, section 2297, Compiled Statutes 1921, is as follows:
*194 “Any person who attempts to commit any crime, and in such attempt does any act toward the commission of such crime, but fails, or is prevented or intercepted in the perpetration thereof, is punishable, where no provision is made by law for the punishment of such attempt, as follows:
“First. If the offense so attempted be punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for four years or more, or by imprisonment in a county jail, the person guilty of such attempt is punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary, or in a county jail, as the case may be, for a term not exceeding one-half the longest term of imprisonment prescribed upon a conviction for the offense so attempted.
“Second. If the offense so attempted be punishable by imprisonment in the penitentiary for any time less than four years, the person guilty of such attempt is punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year.
“Third. If the offense so attempted be punishable by a fine, the offender convicted of such attempt is punishable by a fine not exceeding one-half the largest fine which may be imposed upon a conviction of the offense so attempted.
“Fourth. If the offense so attempted be punishable by imprisonment and by a fine, the offender convicted of such attempt may be punished by both imprisonment and fine, not exceeding one-half the longest term of imprisonment, and one-half the largest fine which may be imposed upon a conviction for the offense so attempted.”
This question was before this court in the case of Ex parte Isabell, 26 Okla. Cr. 1, 221 P. 517, in which the court held:
“The measure of punishment which may be legally imposed upon one convicted of attempting to commit the crime of burglary in the second degree is provided by subdivision 1 of section 2297, Compiled Statutes 1921.”
The conclusion in that case was 'based on the decision *195 of the Supreme Court of North Dakota in Re King, 9 N. D. 149, 82 N. W. 423, and Ex parte Hope, 59 Cal. 423.
In view of the prior holding of this court that the punishment for an attempt to commit burglary in the second degree is fixed by the first subdivision of section 2297, Compiled Statutes 1921, such offense was a felony, and the county court was without jurisdiction.
The case is reversed and remanded, with instructions to the lower court to dismiss for want of jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 P. 246, 29 Okla. Crim. 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.